TruthSeeker RSS

Vue lecture

Il y a de nouveaux articles disponibles, cliquez pour rafraîchir la page.

U.S. Gold Reset: "Stolen" Gold in Fort Knox, US Dollar VS. Gold, Revaluation, Bitcoin Reserve & $37 T Debt Payoff | Ryan McMaken

World Affairs in Context is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

As the gold price reached $3,000 per troy ounce, the Trump administration may consider revaluing U.S. gold reserves. Despite the fact that calls to audit Fort Knox have died down, the existence of nearly 8,000 tons of gold (worth about $750 billion) held at Fort Knox is still surrounded by mystery. Does the gold at Fort Knox even exist? What is its true origin? What’s driving the federal government’s lack of transparency? Will gold revaluation collapse the U.S. dollar, as so many gold brokers claim? Will gold reserves be used to pay off $37 trillion in U.S. national debt or buy Bitcoin for the newly created Federal Bitcoin Reserve? I discussed these and other questions with Ryan McMaken, economist and executive editor at the Mises Institute.

Ryan McMaken notes that the gold held at Fort Knox was effectively “stolen” from the American public by the U.S. government after President Franklin D. Roosevelt issued Executive Order 6102 in 1933. This order effectively made gold ownership, both in coins and bars, illegal for all Americans and punishable by up to ten years in prison.

Follow Ryan McMaken on X, and check out his books and articles here!


Thank you to all my subscribers for being part of World Affairs in Context. Your support makes the newsletter happen, and your questions, ideas, and suggestions inspire it. Please consider becoming a paid subscriber, which will help contribute to the resources needed to produce more content on the platform.

Subscribe now


Follow World Affairs in Context on YouTube for more video content. In the comments section, let me know who you would like to see as a guest on the podcast in the future.

Share World Affairs in Context

💾

Weekly Recommendations & Recap

World Affairs in Context is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Greetings, All!

Let’s catch up on the latest top headlines, opinions, and recommendations.

Venezuela Blockade: Donald Trump Promises to Impose Tariffs on All Oil Importers Venezuela, Targets China and the EU

As America’s “Liberation Day” nears, the Trump administration added yet another country to a growing list of targeted states. The US will impose a 25% tariff on all importers of oil from Venezuela. President Trump clarified that the new tariff would be added to any other tariffs on trade with the United States.

During the past 12 months, nearly 200 cargo ships carrying Venezuela’s oil travelled to Europe, and 90 oil tankers shipped oil to China. The Trump administration might view the policy as a “two birds one stone” approach that allows it to wreck what’s left of Venezuela’s economy (as of February 2024, approximately 82% of Venezuelans live in poverty), potentially increase the cost of a fraction of China’s oil imports and weaken the EU, thus forcing it to focus on the US as its main source of energy (to its own detriment, without a doubt).

Imposing an economic blockade on Venezuela’s main source of revenue will cause disproportionate harm to the country’s civilian population. While economic sanctions are designed to destabilize the country from within, Nicolas Maduro has proven to be rather immune to covert regime change operations.

Subscribe now

End of Dollar Empire: How America Weaponized the World's Economy, Dedollarization Is Irreversible

“The greatest threat to dollar hegemony is that Washington might destroy the pillars underlying the currency’s appeal: rule of law, contract enforcement, government transparency, the unquestioned safety of US treasuries.” (Financial Times)

In a recently published article, Financial Times points out several “truths” that were previously regarded as anti-American: de-dollarization is the result of failed Washington’s policies, not the inherent “evil” of China, Russia, or other actors seeking to protect their economic sovereignty. While the entire world has started to point out the hypocrisy of waging economic wars and weaponizing the most valuable asset of the United States, its dollar as the global reserve currency, US policymakers appear to be in denial as the day when an aggressive tariff regime goes into effect is celebratory advertised as “America’s Liberation Day”.

Since access to the dollar system was essential for governments and businesses around the globe, Washington could punish adversaries without firing a bullet by blocking their ability to transact in dollars.

The trend to amplify currency multipolarity is one of many features that accompany the transition from unipolarity to a more balanced global structure. The US's ability to print an endless supply of dollars and export them abroad solidified US monetary hegemony. The decline of trust in the US dollar is a symptom of a much deeper shift that is transforming the world as well as its main actors.

NEW US-Ukraine Minerals Deal: Looting and Economic Colonization

The US-Ukraine minerals deal, expected to be signed any day, is nothing short of looting Ukraine’s resources for generations to come: the deal, in its current format, is “indefinite” and hands over all resources—oil, gas, minerals—to the United States as the main beneficiary. Even Ukraine’s members of Parliament are protesting on social media platforms: "It [the deal] is not in our favor!

While Volodymir Zelensky appears to deny that close to $120 billion provided in military assistance to Ukraine is, in fact, debt (one has to wonder - did Zelensky believe it was charity or humanitarian aid, or is this a maneuver to manipulate Donald Trump?) that Ukraine must repay, both sides appear to indicate that the agreement is close to being signed.


Thank you to all my subscribers for being part of World Affairs in Context. Your support makes the newsletter happen, and your questions, ideas, and suggestions inspire it. Please consider becoming a paid subscriber, which will help contribute to the resources needed to produce more content on the platform.

Subscribe now


This Week’s Top Headlines

  • On Friday, Elon Musk’s xAI acquired X (formerly Twitter) at a valuation of $33 billion. Combined valuation of XAI Holdings now exceeds $100 billion, not including the debt.

  • With the price of vehicles expected to rise due to new 25% tariffs effective April 3, auto dealers report complete chaos in their showrooms as buyers attempt to purchase a vehicle before the price increases. Automakers are accelerating shipments and builds.

    “US dealerships are sitting on about 60 to 90 days of inventory on average, providing them with a cushion against the immediate effects of the tariffs.

    What happens after that supply runs out remains unclear. Analysts say that automakers will most likely absorb some of the higher costs, dealers may see a hit to profitability and consumers will pay the rest. But exactly how that’s all balanced out is anyone’s guess at this point.” (Bloomberg)

  • The Trump administration is moving ahead with the Golden Dome missile defense project. This is not the first time the US has attempted to create the infrastructure— after issuing an executive order to make it official, President Donald Trump drew parallels with the well-known Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) of 1983 under President Ronald Reagan. An advanced system, whether it is practically justified or not, will cost billions of dollars to develop and implement, and it is a major win for American defense contractors.

  • President Trump threatened Iran, stating that “bad things will happen” if it refused to negotiate with the United States. The escalation follows Iran’s response, conveyed to the US via Oman, which indicated that the country will not agree to coercion but is open to diplomatic, respectful negotiations.

    Following the US withdrawal from the JCPOA agreement, which, according to independent reports, Iran was in full compliance with, the Trump administration may attempt to revive the failed deal. Whether such attempts will be made in good faith remains to be seen.

  • Despite not being acknowledged as such by the responsible parties, the Signalgate scandal that unraveled this week is a complete disaster on an international scale. Where does one even begin? Bombing an entire residential building to allegedly target a single individual, then cheering on an “excellent” outcome as the building collapses with civilians inside? Dislcosure of what should be classified information? A detailed list of planned bombings on Yemen? The list goes on…

    Here is a video of the “bomb Yemen” group chat shared by The Atlantic:

    Ted Snider's article "The Signal Scandal, Carelessness, Revelations, and Hypocrisy" provides an excellent perspective on the failure to protect national security and adhere to the rules of war.

Share World Affairs in Context

What I’m Reading & Listening to This Week

  • This week I enjoyed a podcast America’s Constitutional Crisis by featuring Prof. Katherine Franke from Columbia University. Whether you are independent, right, left or somewhere in the middle, it may be time to admit that selective application of law, as well as blutantly silencing dissent, is a red flag and a sign of much more pervaisive, structural issues that will only exxacerbate if left unchecked.

  • I focused on reading a well-resesarched, insightful book by Samuel Moyn, Humane. I will discuss it in greater detail in a new, Substack-exclusive, video series featuring interviews with authors that I am currently working on (please stay tuned and subscribe to get updates when it is released!)

    Moyn examines the evolution of modern warfare and the bi-partisan push for so-called “humanitarianism” in the context of US foreign policy.

    The author argues that this shift, which began in the mid-20th century, coincided with the rise of "humane" warfare tactics, such as precision bombing and drone strikes, which are portrayed by policymakers as less destructive and more ethical than traditional warfare methods. As we know well, these efforts have not necessarily led to less violence or fewer civilian casualties. Instead, they have provided a moral cover for ongoing US military interventions and endless wars abroad.


Thank you to all of my subscribers for being part of World Affairs in Context. Your support makes the newsletter happen, and your questions, ideas, and suggestions are the inspiration behind it. Please consider becoming a paid subscriber, which will help contribute towards the resources needed to produce more content.

Subscribe now


President Trump's Proposed Tax Law Changes Explained

World Affairs in Context is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

While it may be challenging to keep up with President Trump’s slew of statements, ideas, and new laws, changes to the U.S. tax code have been on Trump’s agenda since he kicked off his 2024 presidential campaign. Against the backdrop of the newly announced tariffs on China, Mexico, and Canada, expected changes to the tax code include reductions in income tax rates and increases in income tax credits. Despite these changes appearing promising at first glance, increases in tariffs (and thus, likely increases in consumer prices) may offset moderate reductions in individual income taxes.

Any changes to tax legislation will proceed through the legislative process called “reconciliation.” On January 17, 2025, a House Ways and Means Committee prepared and circulated a long list of proposed tax law changes.

While writing (and, to be fair, reading) about taxes is arguably the most boring way to pass the time, let’s quickly walk through the key proposed changes to the United States tax code and their expected impact on the U.S. economy. We’ll begin with the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which is the most important part of the proposal.

Extension of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJA”)

Read more

Unipolar World Has Come to an End, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio Admits

World Affairs in Context is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio acknowledges that the unipolar world has come to an end. Despite the United States desperately attempting to maintain its global dominance, great powers China and Russia will continue to use available resources to advance their interests and enhance multipolarity.

The question is - will the United States accept its new role?

Read more

Brutal War on Syria: From Extraordinarily Cruel Economic Sanctions to Supporting Terrorist Proxies. For Western Allies, All Options Are on the Table

World Affairs in Context is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

From whitewashing Nazis in Ukraine to praising jihadists of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham as “freedom fighters” and “Syrian rebels”, Western leaders have abandoned common sense and moral standing.

Syria, the backbone of the Resistance Axis, has effectively become a testing ground of Western brutality towards millions of Syrian civilians who have become victims of continued inhumane economic restrictions and Western-sponsored extreme violence via proxy terrorist organizations. For well over a decade, the world has remained silent and, for the most part, indifferent to the suffering of the Syrian population as the result of financial and economic sanctions imposed by the United States and the European Union. While these restrictions, including the extraordinarily brutal Caesar Act, failed to result in regime change in Syria (the U.S.’ ultimate goal) they continue to kill thousands of innocent civilians as the result of continued deprivation of vital necessities such as life-saving medications and food.

Share World Affairs in Context

As a ceasefire took effect in Lebanon, jihadists backed by the U.S. and Turkiye launched an offensive on the city of Aleppo to disrupt the supply lines of the Axis of Resistance as well as pursue the decade-long goal of toppling the government of President Bashar al-Assad.

Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham in the city of Aleppo on November 29, 2024

The following day, President Bashar al-Assad traveled to Moscow for a working meeting with President Vladimir Putin with whom he discussed Russia’s support for Syria in its fight against terrorist organizations. For the first time since 2016, Russian warplanes are now bombing terrorists in the city of Aleppo.

Subscribe now

The so-called “rebels” or “opposition forces” (as Western media conveniently refers to them) are, in fact, an offshoot of al-Qaeda and are associated with Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), a Salafi-jihadist terrorist organization, led by Abu Mohammad al-Jolani, an affiliate of the founder of ISIS Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. Abu Mohammad al-Jolani is the founder of Jabhat al-Nusra, the al-Qaeda affiliate in Syria.

Abu Mohammad al-Jolani, leader of HTS

HTS established a stronghold in northwestern Syria, with Idlib as its center.


Connect with Lena: YouTube | Rumble | Locals | Patreon | X | Telegram


Since 2011, the United States has been pursuing regime change in Syria via all means available, including hybrid warfare. Jake Sullivan infamously wrote in an email to Hillary Clinton in 2012: "Al Qaeda is on our side in Syria."

After implementing extraordinarily brutal and outright inhumane economic sanctions on Syria, Western allies have been continuously fueling the violence by funding and training terrorist organizations to destabilize Syria and other non-aligned regional actors.

In 2019, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad explained in an interview:

"When they [ the U.S.] sent their army into Iraq, they paid the price. It's much easier to send a proxy. Al Qaeda is a proxy. There is a war between the United States and the rest of the world. Syria is a microcosm of World War 3."

Col. Richard Black, Former Virginia State Senator, shared an excellent overview of U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East and its involvement in Syria since 2011:

  • The Syrian war began in 2011 when the United States landed Central Intelligence operatives to begin coordinating with Al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups;

  • We have been unwavering supporters of Al-Qaeda since before the war formally began;

  • We are supporters of Al-Qaeda today where they’re bottled up in Idlib Province;

  • The CIA supplied them under secret operation Timber Sycamore, providing the jihadists with anti-tank weapons and all of their anti-air missiles;

Read more

To the Last Ukrainian: United States Pressures Zelensky to Lower Conscription Age to 18

World Affairs in Context is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

As brutal videos of forced mobilization across Ukraine continue to spread online, Volodimir Zelensky and his Western masters are determined to continue fighting the unwinnable proxy war against Russia “to the last Ukrainian”: the United States has started to openly pressure Kyiv to, once again, lower the official conscription age. The West wants to send 18-year-old Ukrainians to the front lines as Russian forces advance and Senator Lindsay Graham is getting antsy that trillions of dollars worth of Ukrainian natural resources, primarily located in the Donbas and central Ukraine, will be under Russia’s control.


Share World Affairs in Context


In a recent interview on Fox News, U.S. Senator Lindsay Graham shamelessly admitted that the prolonged proxy war in Ukraine is just as much about trying to weaken Russia via Ukraine as it is about natural resources and, ultimately, money.

Read more

The Federal Reserve Serves the Banker Class, Powell's Shocking Admission & Truth About US Economy | Ryan McMaken

World Affairs in Context is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Does the Federal Reserve want independence to serve the interests of the banker class? What role has the Federal Reserve played in US politics, and how does it enable the U.S. government's out-of-control spending? Why should the Fed be banned from purchasing assets?

I had a fascinating conversation with Ryan McMaken. Ryan is a U.S. economist and the executive editor at the Mises Institute. In his podcast, Loot & Lobby, Ryan focuses on the intersection of US politics and economics.

Ryan and I discussed whether the Trump administration would seek Jerome Powell's resignation, how the Fed has been enabling government spending on programs that do not benefit the American people, its role as a servant of the banker class, and, ultimately, whether the Federal Reserve should be abolished.

Ryan noted that we are living in a world where the “Fed is the economy” and we need to get away from that.


The video interview is available on:

▪️YouTube

▪️Rumble

▪️Patreon


Thank you for being part of the community! Consider becoming a paid subscriber to support my work and to gain access to members-only content:

Subscribe now


Stay in Touch: YouTube | Rumble | Locals | Patreon | X | Telegram

Share World Affairs in Context

💾

'Sanctioned' BRICS: West Shut Down mBRIDGE But Failed to Stop the Global South| Warwick Powell

World Affairs in Context is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

The development of Project mBRIDGE was initiated by China, Hong Kong, Thailand, and the UAE in 2021 through the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub. The blockchain-based infrastructure has been crucial for the development of an alternative financial system that is expected to facilitate the BRICS+ bloc’s cross-border settlements in local currencies.

The Bank for International Settlements Headquarters in Basel, Switzerland. The BIS is known as the “central bank for central banks”

Recently the BIS top executive, Augusten Carstens, announced that the BIS, “the central bank for all central banks”, can no longer work with sanctioned countries. Thus, the BIS is shutting down Project mBRIDGE.

What does the BIS move to shut down the blockchain-based project mean for the BRICS+ bloc? Will it become a major setback in its process to develop a just, alternative financial settlement platform? What role will China assume in the development of mBRIDGE and other systems designed to transact in local currencies?

I had a very interesting conversation with Dr. Warwick Powell, an Adjunct Professor at Queensland University in Australia who is working at the intersection of digital technologies, supply chains, and global political economy & governance. Warwick and I discussed the functionality of mBRIDGE and why it is a significant project for the Global South, how the BIS shutting it down will impact the BRICS’ capabilities and future plans, what Brazil’s chairmanship in 2025 will bring for the association’s future, Lula’s absence at the 2024 Annual Summit in Kazan and more!


The video interview is available on:

▪️YouTube

▪️Rumble

▪️Patreon


Thank you for being part of the community! Consider becoming a paid subscriber to support my work and to gain access to members-only content:

Subscribe now


Stay in Touch: YouTube | Rumble | Locals | Patreon | X | Telegram

Share World Affairs in Context

💾

❌